This article proposes the
black box model as a way to understand the post-conciliar revolution, even
in the absence of discernible mechanisms that might explain such a change.
What is the black box model?
In systems theory, a black box is an open system in which only the inputs (stimuli) and outputs (responses or reactions) are visible, while the internal structure or process remains occult.
'A system is a complex of
interacting elements. Open systems interact with their surroundings and are
capable of importing and exporting information.' (von Bertalanffy 1968, 55,
141).
Input refers to anything that enters the system from its environment. Output is what is processed by the system (the black box) and sent to the environment.
For example:
- A person presses a button on the remote (the input or stimulus)
- The television turns on (the reaction).
- The internal mechanism that produces the output is the black box. It consists of the interactions of electronic elements that result in a specific response, even if the process remains unknown to us.
The black box model applied to the current crisis
The death of Pope Pius
XII marked the end of an era. What
followed, the 1958 conclave, Vatican II, and the new liturgy constituted a
total rupture with Catholicism and the beginning of a new religion. The black
box is a perfect analogy for the crisis. We cannot explain how all this came to
be. We ignore how the elements interacted, and what processes were
required to bring about this revolution. We can only comprehend the inputs
and outputs.
Input: The death of Pius
XII and the 1958 conclave
The death of the last
valid Pope and the vacancy of the Apostolic See were followed by the unusual
conclave of 1958, which resulted in the election of John XXIII, who, just three
months later, would convene the Second Vatican Council.
Output: Vatican II
created a new religion
- New doctrines, including Ecumenism, religious liberty, collegiality, etc.
- The Novus Ordo Missae
- New Sacraments
- New Saints
- New ecclesiology
What is inside the box?
As our method is
restricted to empirical evidence, we can only speculate.
Here is what could be inside the black box:
- The unknown facts and circumstances concerning the conclave of 1958
- The existence of a hidden pope or bishops with ordinary jurisdiction
- An explanation for the near-universal episcopal acceptance of John XXIII, Paul VI, and the new religion
Advantages, weaknesses and limitations of this method
Advantages
- Objectivity
- Evidence-based
- Method appropriate to the object
- Avoids unfounded speculation
- Provides an analytical tool to explain the mystery of iniquity
Disadvantages
- Incompleteness
- Restricted to the inputs and outputs
- Reductionist approach
- Risk of Bias
- Provides descriptive rather than explanatory knowledge
Limitations
This model is useful for
recognising that a system has failed, but it cannot explain how or why it
failed. It cannot reveal the internal mechanisms, intentions, or causal
processes within the black box. As such, it produces descriptive knowledge
without offering a thorough explanation of how or why the rupture occurred.
To sum up:
- Since the Second Vatican Council, the Church has changed her faith, doctrine, discipline, and worship.
- Sedevacantists acknowledge these facts but have not yet explained how the new religion replaced the previous one with minimal effective resistance.
- The black box model provides a useful analytical tool for cases where internal mechanisms are inaccessible, such as the historical events surrounding the 1958 conclave and the emergence of the Novus Ordo Sect.
- According to this model, only inputs and outputs are observable, while internal processes remain hidden.
- Input: The death of Pope Pius XII and the 1958 conclave.
- Output: The post-conciliar revolution.
- The processes and mechanisms within the black box that have led us to the current state of affairs remain unknown.
Make the most of your spiritual life with the CATHOLIC DEVOTIONAL GUIDE 2025
πSEE ALSO:
✅ The Hermeneutic of Absurdity
✅The Mystery of Iniquity: A Commentary on 2 Thessalonians 2
Ludwig von Bertalanffy, General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications (New York: George Braziller, 1968), 55, 141.
.png)
.png)

No comments:
Post a Comment