Catechism on the Dogma 'Outside the Catholic Church
There Is No Salvation' - Free download (PDF)
PREAMBLE OF THE LETTER
1, What was the purpose of the 1949 letter Suprema haec[1] sacra issued by the Holy Office?
To explain the true sense of the Catholic doctrine outside the Church there is no salvation, particularly in response to the case of Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Centre.
2. When was this document issued?
The Holy Office issued the letter on 8 August 1949.
3. Did Pope Pius XII approve this letter?
Yes. The Supreme Pontiff, His Holiness Pope Pius XII, has given full approval to this decision.
4. To whom was the letter addressed?
The letter was addressed to the Archbishop of Boston, Richard J. Cushing.
5. Who published the letter?
The Sacred Congregation ordered Bishop Cushing to publish it in its entirety.
6. Did the Holy See approve the English translation?
Yes. In due obedience, the Archbishop of Boston published the Latin text along with an English translation approved by the Holy See.
SECTION I: THE FOUNDATION OF THE DOGMA
7. What are Catholics bound to believe by divine and Catholic faith?
We are bound by divine and Catholic faith to believe all those things which are contained in the word of God, whether it be Scripture or Tradition, and are proposed by the Church to be believed as divinely revealed, not only through solemn judgment but also through the ordinary and universal teaching office.[2]
8. Has the Church always preached the dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church?
Yes. The Church has always preached this dogma.
9. Will the Church ever cease to preach this doctrine?
No. The infallible teaching that there is no salvation outside the Church will never cease to be preached by the Catholic Church.
10. How must the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation be understood?
This dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church herself understands it. For, it was not to private judgments that Our Saviour gave for explanation those things that are contained in the deposit of faith, but to the teaching authority of the Church.
SECTION II: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND SALVATION
11. What command did Christ give regarding the Church and salvation?
Among the commandments of Christ, that one holds not the least place by which we are commanded to be incorporated by baptism into the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar, through whom He Himself in a visible manner governs the Church on earth.
12. Is salvation possible for those who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuse to submit to the Church or withhold obedience from the Roman Pontiff?
No. No one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.
13. Did Christ decree the Church to be a means of salvation?
Yes. Not only did the Saviour command that all nations should enter the Church, but He also decreed the Church to be a means of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of eternal glory.
SECTION III: DESIRE FOR THE CHURCH AND IMPLICIT MEMBERSHIP
14. Can someone be saved without being a visible member of the Church?
Yes. That one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member. In fact, it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.
15. Does this desire always need to be explicit?
No. This desire need not always be explicit, as it is in catechumens; when a person is in invincible ignorance, God also accepts an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.
16. Where is this doctrine found?
This teaching is taught in the dogmatic letter issued by the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Pius XII, on 29 June 1943, On the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ.[3] In this letter, the Pope distinguishes between those who are incorporated into the Church as members and those who are united to her only by desire.
17. Who are those incorporated into the Church as members?
Discussing the members of which the Mystical Body is composed here on earth, the same august Pontiff says: 'Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been baptised and profess the true faith, and who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed.'[4]
18. Who are those united to the Church only by desire?
Toward the end of this same encyclical letter, when most affectionately inviting to unity those who do not belong to the body of the Catholic Church, he mentions those who 'are related to the Mystical Body of the Redeemer by a certain unconscious yearning and desire,' and these he by no means excludes from eternal salvation, but on the other hand states that they are in a condition 'in which they cannot be sure of their salvation' since 'they remain deprived of those many heavenly gifts and helps which can only be enjoyed in the Catholic Church.'[5]
19. What errors did Pope Pius XII condemn regarding salvation?
The Pope reproves both those who exclude from eternal salvation all united to the Church only by implicit desire, and those who falsely assert that men can be saved equally well in every religion.[6]
20. Is any kind of desire to enter the Church sufficient for salvation?
No. It must not be thought that any kind of desire to enter the Church suffices that one may be saved. The desire by which one is related to the Church must be animated by perfect charity.
21. Can an implicit desire produce its effect without supernatural faith?
No. No implicit desire can produce its effect unless a person has supernatural faith: 'For he who comes to God must believe that God exists and is a rewarder of those who seek Him'.[7]
The Council of Trent declares (Session VI, chap. 8): 'Faith is the beginning of man's salvation, the foundation and root of all justification, without which it is impossible to please God and attain to the fellowship of His children.'[8]
SECTION IV: THE ERRORS OF FR. LEONARD FEENEY AND THE ST. BENEDICT CENTRE
22. Do the publications of Fr Leonard Feeney and the St Benedict Centre represent the genuine teaching of the Catholic Church?
From what has been said it is evident that those things which are proposed in the periodical From the Housetops, fascicle 3, as the genuine teaching of the Catholic Church are far from being such and are very harmful both to those within the Church and those without.
23. What are the implications of those doctrinal declarations?
From these declarations which pertain to doctrine, certain conclusions follow which regard discipline and conduct, and which cannot be unknown to those who vigorously defend the necessity by which all are bound of belonging to the true Church and of submitting to the authority of the Roman Pontiff and of the Bishops 'whom the Holy Ghost has placed… to rule the Church'.[9]
24. Can someone rightly claim to defend the Catholic Faith while rejecting the lawful ecclesiastical authority?
It is beyond understanding how a member of a religious Institute, namely Father Feeney, presents himself as a 'Defender of the Faith,' and at the same time does not hesitate to attack the catechetical instruction proposed by lawful authorities, and has not even feared to incur grave sanctions threatened by the sacred canons because of his serious violations of his duties as a religious, a priest, and an ordinary member of the Church.
25. Is it permissible to publish theological materials without ecclesiastical approval?
It is in no wise to be tolerated that certain Catholics shall claim for themselves the right to publish a periodical, to spread theological doctrines, without the permission of competent Church authority, called the imprimatur which is prescribed by the sacred canons.
Therefore, let them who in grave peril are ranged against the Church seriously bear in mind that after 'Rome has spoken' they cannot be excused even by reasons of good faith. Certainly, their bond and duty of obedience toward the Church is much graver than that of those who as yet are related to the Church 'only by an unconscious desire.' Let them realise that they are children of the Church, lovingly nourished by her with the milk of doctrine and the sacraments, and hence, having heard the clear voice of their Mother, they cannot be excused from culpable ignorance, and therefore to them apply without any restriction that principle: submission to the Catholic Church and the Sovereign Pontiff is required as necessary for salvation.
26. What warning is given to those who knowingly oppose the Church's teaching?
Therefore, let them who in grave peril are ranged against the Church seriously bear in mind that after 'Rome has spoken' they cannot be excused even by reasons of good faith. Certainly, their bond and duty of obedience toward the Church is much graver than that of those who as yet are related to the Church 'only by an unconscious desire.' Let them realise that they are children of the Church, lovingly nourished by her with the milk of doctrine and the sacraments, and hence, having heard the clear voice of their Mother, they cannot be excused from culpable ignorance, and therefore to them apply without any restriction that principle: submission to the Catholic Church and to the Sovereign Pontiff is required as necessary for salvation.
APPENDIX
Letter from the Holy Office Concerning Fr. Leonard Feeney – Summarised by Monsignor Joseph Clifford Fenton[10]
(1) The teaching that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church is a dogma of the Catholic faith.
(2) This dogma has always been taught, and will always be taught, infallibly by the Church’s magisterium.
(3) The dogma must be understood and explained as the Church’s magisterium understands and explains it.
(4) The Church is necessary for salvation with both a necessity of precept and a necessity of means.
(5) Because the Church is necessary for salvation with the necessity of precept, any person who knows the Church to have been divinely instituted by Our Lord and yet refuses to enter it or to remain within it cannot attain eternal salvation.
(6) The Church is a general and necessary means for salvation, not by reason of any intrinsic necessity, but only by God’s own institution, that is, because God in His merciful wisdom has established it as such.
(7) In order that a man may be saved within the Church, it is not always necessary that he belong to the Church in re, actually as a member, but it can sometimes be enough that he belongs to it as one who desires or wills to be in it. In other words, it is possible for one who belongs to the Church only in desire or in voto to be saved.
(8) It is possible for this desire of entering the Church to be effective, not only when it is explicit, but also (when the person is invincibly ignorant of the true Church) even when that desire or votum is merely implicit.
(9) The Mystici Corporis reproved both the error of those who teach the impossibility of salvation for those who have only an implicit desire to enter the Church, and the false doctrine of those who claim that men may find salvation equally in every religion.
(10) No desire to enter the Church can be effective for salvation unless it is enlightened by supernatural faith and animated or motivated by perfect charity.