Monday, 29 September 2025

Synodal Revolution: A Plot to Undermine the Deposit of Faith

The Jubilee of Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies 

On 24 September 2025, the General Secretariat of the Synod announced that the Jubilee of Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies will take place in the Vatican from 24 to 26 October 2025. The programme will include moments of formation and exchange among participants, as well as liturgical events, culminating in the celebration of Holy Mass on Sunday, 26 October, presided over by 'Pope' Leo XIV.

Among the 25 scheduled workshops, one immediately caught my attention: a session on polarity management. At first, I assumed it was merely a newly coined modernist term, but I was mistaken. I discovered that not only is it a genuine discipline, but it is also a highly effective instrument in the hands of modernists.

In this article, I will examine this concept and discuss how it is being used to advance the ongoing phase of the post-conciliar revolution.

How to deal with Unsolvable Problems

In our daily lives, we often encounter many trials and tribulations. These can be divided into two main groups:

Problems: ordinary difficulties that can be addressed and solved.

Polarities (or paradoxes): inherently insoluble difficulties that cannot be solved, but only managed. They consist of opposing, interdependent, and coexisting ideas; in other words, one cannot function or exist without the other.

Polarity Management [1] is an organisational development model created to identify and address opposing forces. It requires:

1. Recognising the value of both poles and respecting resistance to one-sided solutions.

2. Adopting new ways of thinking, such as moving from:

  • Rigidity to flexibility
  • Autocracy to participation
  • Centralisation to decentralisation

3. Accepting the dialectical tension between the two extremes as a natural attribute of the system.

4. Listening to the concerns of those who resist change and understanding their perspective.

5. Adopting a both/and mentality instead of an either/or approach.

The proponents of this theory argue that this mindset brings several benefits, including:

  • Rigidity to flexibility
  •  Autocracy to participation 
  • Centralisation to decentralisation

Synodal Revolution and Polarity Management

The synodal documents themselves reveal how this model has been used to advance their agenda. 

These principles may be summarised as follows:

1. There is a  continuous articulation of certain polarities and tensions that structure the life of the Church and the way in which ecclesiological categories express it:[2]

  • The whole Church and the local Church;
  • The Church as the People of God, as the Body of Christ and as the Temple of the Spirit;
  • The participation of all and the authority of some;
  • Synodality, collegiality, and primacy;
  • The common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood;'
  • Ministry (ordained and instituted ministries) and participation in the mission by virtue of baptismal vocation without a ministerial form.

2. Implementation of the FD requires addressing and discerning these dualities as they arise in the circumstances in which each local Church exists.[3]

3. The path to advance is not to seek an impossible arrangement that eliminates dualisms in favour of one of the sides.[4]

4. The entire synodal exercise was one of active participation at diverse levels. For this process to continue, a change of mindset and a renewal of existing structures are needed.[5]

5. A synodal Church first of all needs to deal with the many conflicts that emerge from encountering diversity. Therefore, a synodal spirituality can only be one that welcomes differences.[6]

Critical Analysis and Commentaries

1. Introducing novelties under the guise of reform:

Polarity management, though well-established in the corporate world, is alien to Sacred Theology. The importation of such concepts into the Church creates ambiguities and undermines the deposit of faith, ultimately distorting rather than enriching ecclesial life.

2. Heresy and orthodoxy cannot coexist:

The Church is not built on dialectical polarities, but on divine revelation. Catholicism is essentially an either/or religion. Heresy is not treated as a necessary counterpart to orthodoxy but as a deadly disease to be condemned. Treating heresy as a necessary dialectical counterpart to orthodoxy undermines the Church’s mission.

3. A change of mindset leads to a change of faith:

The current reform process insists on the need for a 'new way of thinking' in order to advance reform. However, the Catholic faith does not permit such innovation. The First Vatican Council solemnly declared: 'The meaning of the sacred dogmas, once declared by Holy Mother Church, must always be preserved, and this meaning must never be abandoned under the pretext or in the name of a deeper understanding'.[7] 

4. Encountering Diversity: 

The Vatican assembly demands that all differences be welcomed as if they were gifts of the Spirit. But not all diversity is good, desirable, or compatible with revealed truth. The Church has always distinguished between legitimate diversity—such as liturgical rites within the one true faith—and destructive plurality, which undermines apostolic tradition. Elevating diversity as an absolute sanctifies division. A Church that glories indiscriminately in differences risks dissolving the very unity of the Mystical Body of Christ.

*****

Our Lord founded His Church to carry forward His work of redemption until the end of time. Her mission is not to navigate tensions or celebrate diversity, but to proclaim divine certainties with the unwavering voice of Christ: 'Let your speech be yea, yea: no, no.'[8] The Mystical Body of Christ does not need polarity management, but of fidelity; it has no use for perpetual contradictions, but for the immutable deposit of faith entrusted once delivered to the saints.[9]


πŸ”ŽSEE ALSO: 

 >>>SITE MAP/ INDEX<<< 

[1] Johnson, Barry. Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, 1996.

[2] General Secretariat of the Synod, Pathways for the Implementation Phase of the Synod (Vatican City: General Secretariat of the Synod, July 8, 2025), p. 18–19, https://www.synod.va/content/dam/synod/process/implementation/pathways/250102---ENG-Pathways-for-the-implementation-phase.pdf

3 Ibid., p. 18.

[4] Ibid., p. 19.

[5] General Secretariat of the Synod, Working Document for the Continental Stage (Vatican City: General Secretariat of the Synod, October 25, 2022), 30–31, https://www.synod.va/content/dam/synod/common/phases/continental-stage/dcs/20221025-ENG-DTC-FINAL-OK.pdf.

[6] Ibid., p. 35-36.

[7] Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution Dei Filius, Chapter 4; D.1800;

[8] Matthew 5:37 

[9] Jude 1:3

No comments:

Post a Comment

Synodal Revolution: A Plot to Undermine the Deposit of Faith

The Jubilee of Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies  On 24 September 2025, the General Secretariat of the Synod announced that the Jubilee...